mnavy war college navy planning course 5 week

If a commander is fully involved in the decisionmaking process, however, there would be no need for any of these briefings. Throughout the decisionmaking process, the staff prepares briefings for the commander for almost every step of the estimate. Also (and despite the statements in various Service doctrinal documents), the role and importance of a commander in the decisionmaking process have been greatly reduced. The result is the blurring or even eliminating distinctions between decisionmaking and planning. Many elements of planning and staff functions/actions have been meshed with decisionmaking.

Perhaps the single biggest problem is that the commander’s estimate has become de facto an integral part of the planning process. This, in turn, has made the decisionmaking process cumbersome, rigid, and time-consuming. Since the early 1990s, the trend has been to progressively clutter each step of the estimate with poorly related or even unrelated considerations. It also resembles a long list of tasks or even concept of operations (CONOPS). It includes elements that do not belong there. The commander’s intent should be far more important than the mission, but it is not. Among other things, the mission statement consists of essential tasks and purpose(s) instead of being identical to the objective. doctrinal documents violates some key tenets of German-style mission command ( Auftragstaktik). The decisionmaking process as described in U.S. Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technician conducts post-mission analysis on sonar imagery that IVER unmanned underwater vehicle collected during Exercise Clear Horizon, Republic of Korea, Novem(U.S.

Mnavy war college navy planning course 5 week